141
        
        
          
            12.
          
        
        
          Alopaeus, H. & E. Elvestad 2006: Avaldsnesskipet- et
        
        
          ”nordisk” skip fra Polen, typescript Stavanger.
        
        
          
            13.
          
        
        
          Maarleveld, Th.J., 1984:
        
        
          
            Archeologie in troebel water.
          
        
        
          
            Een nieuwe werkwijze voor scheepsonderzoek. Twee
          
        
        
          
            schepen onderzocht.
          
        
        
          Rijswijk.
        
        
          
            14.
          
        
        
          Crumlin-Pedersen, O., 2000: To be or not to be a cog:
        
        
          the Bremen Cog in perspective,
        
        
          
            The International Journal
          
        
        
          
            of Nautical Archaeology
          
        
        
          (2000) 29.2: 230-246.
        
        
          
            15.
          
        
        
          Förster, T., 2000: Schiffbau und Handel an der
        
        
          südwestlichenOstsee - Untersuchungen anWrackfunden des
        
        
          13.-15. Jahrhunderts.
        
        
          
            Beitrage zur Ur- und Frühgeschichte
          
        
        
          
            Mecklenburg-Vorpommerns,
          
        
        
          Band 35, 221-236.
        
        
          
            16.
          
        
        
          Diskussionen om
        
        
          
            emiske
          
        
        
          og
        
        
          
            etiske
          
        
        
          typer har intet med
        
        
          etik at gøre, men er en diskussion af, om vi afdækker
        
        
          materialets oprindelige kategorier (emisk, middelalderens
        
        
          brug af ordet ’kogge’) eller om kategorierne er skabt af
        
        
          forskeren (etisk, vores brug af ordet ’kogge’).
        
        
          
            17.
          
        
        
          Maarleveld, Th.J., 1995: Type or technique. Some
        
        
          thoughts on boat and ship finds as indicative of cultural
        
        
          traditions.
        
        
          
            International Journal of Nautical Archaeology
          
        
        
          24.1, 3-7.
        
        
          
            18.
          
        
        
          Pers. medd. Lars Froberg Mortensen
        
        
          
            19.
          
        
        
          
            MOSS Project Newsletter
          
        
        
          4/2003.
        
        
          
            20.
          
        
        
          Kühn, H. J., 1999:
        
        
          
            Gestrandet bei Uelvesbüll. Wrack-
          
        
        
          
            archäologie in Nordfriesland,
          
        
        
          Husum; R. Daalder, et al.:
        
        
          
            Goud uit Graan, Nederland en het Oostzeegebied 1600-
          
        
        
          
            1850,
          
        
        
          Amsterdam.
        
        
          
            Summary
          
        
        
          In lateApril 2006, the trawler E 4
        
        
          
            Ho Bugt
          
        
        
          from Esbjerg was
        
        
          shrimping south of Fanø when its nets became entangled in
        
        
          wreckage. The find was duly reported: the wreckage of a
        
        
          thirteenth century ship, probably a cargo vessel. The find
        
        
          and the circumstances surrounding it are discussed in this
        
        
          paper. The discussion is also used to introduce Sjæklen’s
        
        
          readers to the maritime archaeology programme which
        
        
          is presently taking shape in the context of the Centre for
        
        
          Maritime and Regional Studies, in which the Fisheries and
        
        
          Maritime Museum and the University of Southern Denmark
        
        
          are participating. The focus of the programme is explained
        
        
          together with the way in which this find will contribute
        
        
          to our perception of heritage and the way we look at the
        
        
          formation and preservation of archaeological sites, and to
        
        
          a detailed understanding of shipbuilding technology. Based
        
        
          at Esbjerg, the programme has a specific interest in the
        
        
          northernmost part of the Wadden Sea, which  has actually
        
        
          commanded very little maritime archaeological attention to
        
        
          date.
        
        
          When the recently discovered ship sank, Knude Dyb
        
        
          was the entry to the market city of Ribe, then in its heyday.
        
        
          The dynamism of erosion and sedimentation in such tidal
        
        
          gullies can produce marine archaeological sites of great
        
        
          integrity - this has proved to be the case in other Wadden
        
        
          Sea inlets and gullies. Nevertheless, the Knude Dyb wreck
        
        
          has evidently not kept its integrity. We may assume that
        
        
          any cargo or inventory may have dispersed. Even though
        
        
          we may only be looking at fragments of the hull with little
        
        
          expectation of associated finds, the find is still very much
        
        
          worthwhile. Comparison of details with a few other specific
        
        
          finds will help us to understand the variability of ship types
        
        
          and shipbuilding techniques in this particular period, a
        
        
          subject which is much discussed in maritime archaeological
        
        
          circles. In fact it is argued that in this specific case, it would
        
        
          be rewarding scientifically, and justifiable from the point of
        
        
          view of heritage management, to complement the present
        
        
          material with any fragments which may still be present at
        
        
          the site, but the responsible authorities must decide on this.
        
        
          Before any such decision can be taken, we should find
        
        
          out whether more of the ship can be localised. Organising a
        
        
          survey of the area is the obvious first step. The crew of the
        
        
          
            Ho
          
        
        
          
            Bugt
          
        
        
          may be able to help, and the possibility of organising
        
        
          such a survey as a joint effort of the maritime archaeological
        
        
          programme, the Fisheries and Maritime Museum, the
        
        
          Strandingsmuseum in Thorsminde, the Viking Museum
        
        
          in Roskilde and any other partners has been discussed. As
        
        
          a sonar survey would provide the most urgently needed
        
        
          information, the deployment of an SSS system has been
        
        
          discussed with the Esbjerg-based firm MacArtney A/S.