Previous Page  29 / 196 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 29 / 196 Next Page
Page Background

30.

SA-Asd. 5061.315 fo. 114, 118.

31.

SA-Asd. 5061.322 fo. 112.

32.

Professionelle lovbrydere kan ofte skelnes fra amatø-

rerne ved deres aliaser eller øgenavne, der også blev brugt i

retten. Øgenavnene kunne referere til deres hjemstavn som

i tilfældet med Maritje Lourense fra Ribe, der blev kaldt

Nortse Maritje, Maritje fra Nord. Kvindernes navne var dog

tit lidt mere saftige end dette som for eksempel Storbrystede

Bertha, Fede Røv og Sødekussen.

33.

SA-Asd. 5061.300 fo. 182, 193, 194-200, 205; 5061.302

fo. 241v; 5061.305 fo. 17-20, 30-34, 175-176, 182A-183A,

247-249; 5061.307 fo. 22, 48; 4061.308: fo. 102; 5061. 577;

5061. 579; 5061.580.

34.

SA-Asd. 5061.536 fo. 43M-Rv; 5061. 614 fo. 38-39.

35.

SA. Asd. 5061.360 fo. 204v-205.

36.

SA-Asd. 5061.415 fo. 41-42, 66.

37.

Erik Gøbel: Danske i det nederlandske ostindiske kom-

pagnis tjeneste i det 17. århundrede, Hans Jeppesen:

Han-

dels- og Søfartsmuseet på Kronborg. Årbog 2003.

Helsingør

2003, p. 12. Lars Henningsen: Horisonternes land,

Slesvig

(online) 2009, nr. 2.

38.

SA-Asd. 5061.307 fo. 251; 5061.313 fo. 161;

5061.630G; 5061.319 fo. 172.

39.

SA-Asd. 5061.292 fo. 7, 13v; 5061.570 fo. 7.

40.

Lotte van de Pol: op.cit., 2011, p. 147-150.

41.

Lotte van de Pol: op.cit., 2011, p. 146.

42.

SA-Asd. 5061.221v-223, 226, 228v-229.

43.

Max Pedersen: op.cit., 2013, p. 83.

44.

Max Pedersen: op.cit., 2013, p. 94.

45.

Torben Tranæs & Lars Pico Gerdensen.

Forbryderen og

samfundet.

København 2008.

Summary

In the 1600s and 1700s, many people in the North Sea re-

gion emigrated to Amsterdam, whose open labour market

was characterised over long periods by a considerable de-

mand for foreign manpower. Many of the immigrants – not

least the Scandinavians – were ordinary people who did not

make any great mark on history. One of the few sources to

provide an insight into the ordinary immigrants’ lives is

Amsterdam’s court records, in which 34 women and 102

men from the Wadden Sea appear. This article concerns

these 136 people.

The 136 Wadden Sea residents were charged – and in

most cases also convicted – of a wide range of offences

ranging from begging to personal violence and murder. But

the most common offences were theft, swindling, smugg-

ling and prostitution. Around 60% of the Wadden Sea resi-

dents were convicted of one of these offences. Given the

brief case descriptions in Amsterdam’s court records, it can

be difficult to determine the reason why the Wadden Sea

residents committed these crimes. However, several cases

indicate that it was often a matter of subsistence crimi-

nality, evidently because the defendants were unemployed

or had difficulty generating enough income to put food on

the table and a roof over their head. The cases thus bear col-

lective witness to the fact that it could be difficult to estab-

lish oneself as an immigrant in Amsterdam, even though the

city was one of Europe’s richest.

A comparison between Amsterdam’s banns register and

the city’s court records shows that the immigrants from

the Wadden Sea were far less criminally inclined than the

immigrants from cities such as Copenhagen and Elsinore.

The article argues that one of the reasons for this was that

the immigrants from the Wadden Sea generally had a bet-

ter social network in the form of family members who had

also immigrated to Amsterdam. This network meant that the

Wadden Sea residents could obtain greater support and as-

sistance in connection with life’s crises such as unemploy-

ment. The immigrants from Copenhagen and Elsinore did

not enjoy the same protection and they were thus compelled

to a higher degree to turn to criminality to survive.

The article is the result of a current charting of all the

Danes who were brought before the court in Amsterdam

in the period from the mid-1500s to the beginning of the

1800s. A total of 843 persons was registered, 815 of whom

were brought before the court in the 1600s and 1700s. The

project is the first of its kind and was undertaken in a part-

nership between the two authors, one of whom is a Dutch

legal historian while the other is a Danish anthropologist.

27