Sjæklen 2018

71 Litteratur • Árnason, Arnar, et al. Introduction. Arnar Árnason, et al. (red.): Comparing Rural Development: Continuity and Change in the Countryside of Western Europe. Surrey 2009, s. 1–16. • Astrup Hansen, Jørn. Reguleringen, Der Gik i Fisk. Berlingske Tidende , 20 sept 2015. • Bloksgaard, Lotte, et al. Lige Muligheder? Helene Pristed Nielsen og Stine Thidemann Faber (red.) Den Globale Udkant , Aalborg 2016 s. 153–84. • Brookfield, Katherine, et al. The Concept of Fisheries-Dependent Communities A Comparative Analysis of Four UK Case Studies: Shetland, Peterhead, North Shields and Lowestoft. Fisheries Research 72 nr. 1 April 2005, s. 55–69. • Dahlström, Margareta. Young Women in a Male Periphery—Experiences in the Scan- dinavian North. Journal of Rural Studies 12 nr. 3 1996, s. 259–71. • Dinesen, Grete E, et al. Individual Transferable Quotas, Does One Size Fit All? Sustain- ability Analysis of an Alternative Model for Quota Allocation in a Small-Scale Coastal Fishery. Marine Policy 88 February 2018, s. 23–31. • Faber, Stine Thidemann, et al. Place, (In)Equality and Gender: A Mapping of Challenges and Best Practices in Relation to Gender, Education and Population Flows in Nordic Periph- eral Areas . Copenhagen 2015. • Fisker, Jens. Produktionen af en lokalitet i udkanten. Frederikshavn igennem tid og rum. Helene Pristed Nielsen og Stine Thidemann Faber (red.): Den globale udkant. Aalborg 2016, kapital 4. • Forsberg, Gunnel. Rural and Gender Studies: A Conceptual Comparison. Norsk Geogra- fisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography 55 nr. 3 2001, s. 152–60. • Hamilton, Lawrence C, og Melissa J Butler. Outport Adaptations: Social Indicators through Newfoundland’s Cod Crisis. Human Ecology Review 8 nr. 2 2001, s. 1–11. • Hamilton, Lawrence C., et al. Migration from Resource Depletion: The Case of the Faroe Islands. Society & Natural Resources 17 nr. 5 May 2004, s. 443–53. • Hamilton, Lawrence C., og Oddmund Otterstad. Demographic Change and Fisheries Dependence in the Northern Atlantic. Human Ecology Review 5 nr. 1 1998, s. 16–22. • Hegland, Troels Jacob og Jesper Raakjær. Implementation Politics: The Case of Den- mark under the Common Fisheries Policy. Stig S. Gezelius og Jesper Raakjær (red.), Making Fisheries Management Work . Springer 2008, s. 161–98. • Høst, Jeppe. Market-Based Fisheries Management: Private Fish and Captains of Finance . MARE Publication Series. Vol. 16. Springer, 2015. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16432-8. • Høst, Jeppe. Kvote og fisk på det frie marked. Kulturstudier nr. 2 2014, s. 1-12. • Johnsen, Jahn Petter, og Jostein Vik. Pushed or Pulled? Understanding Fishery Exit in a Welfare Society Context. Maritime Studies 12, nr. 4 2013, s. 1–20. • Kvale, S., 1998. Interview: En introduktion til det kvalitative forskningsinterview, Hans Reitzels Forlag. • Massey, Doreen. A Global Sense of Place. Space, Place, and Gender. Minneapolis 1994, s. 146–56. • Masterplan Lildstrand 2018-2030 . Thisted Kommune. Havboernes Forening, Lildstrand, 2018. http://www.thisted.dk/~/media/ESDH/committees/141/278/Punkt_110_Bilag_7_ Masterplan_Lildstrand_11_april_2018_2238compressed.ashx. • McDowell, Linda. Gender, Identity and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies . Cambridge, 1999. • Neis, Barbara, et al. Women and Children First: The Gendered and Generational Social-Ecology of Smaller-Scale Fisheries in Newfoundland and Labrador Ecology and Society 18 nr. 4 2013. • Ounanian, Kristen. In Place of Fishing: Coastal Communities in Transition. PhD Thesis. University of Rhode Island; Aalborg Universitet, 2016. doi:10.5278/vbn.phd.eng- sci.00101. • Ounanian, Kristen. Fiskekvoter handler ikke kun om økonomi, læsebrev, Dagbladet Information 30 okt 2017. • Ounanian, Kristen. Not a ‘Museum Town’: Discussions of Authenticity in Coastal Denmark. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change 2018, s. 1–21. doi:10.1080/14766825 .2018.1456544. • Reed, Matt, et al. Beyond Fish as Commodities: Understanding the Socio-Cultural Role of Inshore Fisheries in England. Marine Policy 37 January 2013: s. 62–68. • Ross, Natalie. Exploring Concepts of Fisheries ‘Dependency’ and ‘Community’ in Scot- land. Marine Policy 37 January 2013, s. 55–61. • Shucksmith, Mark, og Katrina Rønningen. The Uplands after Neoliberalism? – The Role of the Small Farm in Rural Sustainability. Journal of Rural Studies 27, nr. 3 2011, s. 275–87. • Sognedata, Lild Sogn, KM5. Danmarks Statistik , 2018. • Urquhart, Julie, et al. Setting an Agenda for Social Science Research in Fisheries Policy in Northern Europe. Fisheries Research 108 nr. 2–3 March 2011, s. 240–47. Summary Masculinity and fisheries dependence in a Danish fishing village – a story of decline? In the past few years, changes in the Danish fisheries manage- ment system has led to major upheavals in the fisheries sector. Since 2007 fishing access in Denmark has mainly been allocated through a system of individual transferable quotas, which in turn has led to concentration and consolidation within the com- mercial fishing fleet. Geographically, such concentration and consolidation has disadvantaged the smaller coastal communit- ies and ports. Based on a qualitative case study in the coastal vil- lage of Lildstrand, the article focuses on some of the challenges perceived as a consequence of these structural changes and the distribution of fisheries activities. The study especially attends to Lildstrand’s gendered spaces and related understandings of masculinity in its traditionally dominant sector and its signific- ance to the community’s social cohesion. The article argues that the change in the fisheries management regime has had a number of negative consequences for the local area in Lildstrand, including decline in population, loss of jobs, weakening of social coherence, and a loss of occupational identity among former fishermen. The community used to rely heavily on commercial fishing but now finds itself in a state of transition morphing into tourism—a development that clashes with local perceptions of place and identity. In conclusion, de- bates and decisions about Danish fisheries management in re- cent years have not sufficiently focused on social and cultural consequences of fisheries restructuring.